An Analysis of Uchumi Supermarkets’ Financial Ratios

alysis of Analysis of Analysis of Analysis of Analysis of Analysis of Analysis of Analysis of Financial RatiosFinancial RatiosFinancial RatiosFinancial Ratios Financial Ratios Financial RatiosFinancial RatiosFinancial Ratios Financial Ratios - Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Uchumi Supermarkets Financial Ratios are relative magnitudes of select numeric items of a company’s financial statements. The assessment of the operating performance of a company is based on five main types of ratios. These are liquidity, gearing or solvency, activity, profitability and investor ratios. Profitability ratios†¦show more content†¦Despite the positive gross profit margin, the negative values in the other ratios indicate a strong inability to cover operating expenses. These ratios should be relatively constant. Retailers generally have lower profit margins than other industries, with food retail averaging 3%margins. The rising competition may 1 Gross Profit Margin GP / Rev 14.42% 16.27% 17.31% 15.40% 16.84% 2 Operating Profit Margin EBIT / Rev -8.13% -2.85% 1.01% 1.90% 6.25% 3 Net Profit Margin PAT / Rev -8.68% -2.29% 0.63% 1.12% 3.92% MBA 8101 Assignment: Financial Ratios - Uchumi Supermarkets 4 force reduction in prices and this would also not auger well with the current margins of the company. Overall, not good. b. Return on Investment Amount of profit relative to the assets employed to produce that profit. The returns to investors have sharply decreased with time. Currently they are negative values. These indicate inability to efficiently apply the resources to generate proportionate wealth. It also suggests difficulty in servicing its debt. Not good. 4 Return on Investment ROI PAT / TA -21.16% -5.95% 1.97% 4.57% 13.39% 5 Return on Equity ROE PAT / TL -21.90% -7.46% 3.10% 8.80% 23.84% 6 Return on Capital Employed ROCE EBIT / ( TE + NCL ) -123.00% -36.60% 8.57% 16.10% 48.76% D. Activity Ratios Efficiency in applying resources/assets. How well assets are used. Usually turnover rations and indicate the benefits produced by specific assets in classes or collectively. The turnover days onShow MoreRelatedFactors That Influence the Capital Structure Decision of the Firm9372 Words   |  38 PagesThe main objective of this study is to ascertain the factors that significantly influence capital structure decisions. The factors tested are: The firm’s age, size, growth, tangibility, profitability, business risk and non-debt tax shield. From my analysis all these factors were found to be significant but at varying levels, with profitability and company growth as the most significant. TABLE OF CONTENTS Declaration ii Acknowledgement iii Abstract iv Table of Contents Read MoreEffect of Corporate Governance on Financial Performance14210 Words   |  57 PagesREVIEW†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 13 2.1 Introduction..†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦....13 2.2 theoretical framework†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..13 2.3 Good corporate governance and operating costs†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.†¦18 2.4 Correlation between good corporate governance and performance ratios†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...20 2.5 Chapter summary†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 24 3.0 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLGY†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦25 3.1 Introduction †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 25 3.2 Research design†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦25 3.3 Population †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦......Read MoreThe Effects of Ownership Structure, Board Effectiveness and Managerial Discretion on Performance of Listed Companies in Kenya27922 Words   |  112 Pagesthe whole research would have come down crumbling for lack of analytical tools. I also thank Dr. X. N. Iraki for sharing with me his special statistical and analytical skills and insights that have proved exceedingly useful in the course of data analysis. Professor Germano Mwabu, Prof. Winnie Mitula, Dr. Philip Nying’uro, Dr. Otieno Agwanda, Dr. Mwenda Mbatia, Dr. Oriare Nyarwath, Dr. Seth Gor, David Onuong’a, Luther Otieno-Odhiambo and Ambrose Ochieng’ Oloo kept me on my toes to complete the